I had a wonderful time working the Autism
Votes booth at the yearly Autism Speaks walk in Honolulu yesterday. I met so many terrific people, all in some
way connected to autism. Of course, with
1 in 88 children now affected, it’s hard NOT to know someone who is in some way
impacted.
I started up a conversation with a man who
has a 5 year old autistic son, and they have a new baby. “Boy or girl?” I ask
with intent. “A boy”, he said, in somewhat hushed tones, knowing exactly what I
was getting at. For reasons still unknown, autism now affects almost 5 times as
many boys as girls—1 in 54 boys are now diagnosed with autism, and chances of
having an autistic child when parents already have one child on the spectrum is
20%, or 1 in 5.
I oohed and aahed over his adorable little
guy as the proud dad told me he was very alert and social, an indirect way of
assuring me—or more likely, himself—that this beautiful baby did not, could not
have autism.
So why are boys significantly more frequently
afflicted with autism than girls? I saw
a presentation of an interesting theory last fall by Dr. Valerie Hu from George
Washington University. Dr. Hu, a
molecular biologist who has specialized in researching causes and possible medical
treatments for autism, is also the mother of an autistic son.
She has published the results of a study that
found male and female sex hormones regulate expression of an important gene
called “RORA”. This gene encodes a protein that works as a master switch for
gene expression, turning genes on and off. RORA is critical in cerebellum development as
well as other processes impaired in autism. Dr. Hu’s research found RORA was
decreased in the autistic brain, and a protein called aromatase that is
regulated by RORA is also reduced in autistic brains.
Aromatase converts testosterone to estrogen;
therefore a decrease in aromatase could result in increasing levels of
testosterone, further decreasing RORA expression. Dr. Hu believes girls might
be more protected against RORA deficiency because of the effects of estrogen.
A promising
theory…but I’m not a molecular biologist.
I’m just a mom who was holding an adorable baby boy wondering if he
would be 1 in 54.
No comments:
Post a Comment